When the
film Frozen came out in late 2013, many people over the Internet were calling
it a feminist film. While you could argue that point, especially in the case of
Elsa, I think the film is trying to appear feminist without really skewing from
the path of a traditional Disney Princess film.
The
original idea for Frozen was based on the story of the Snow Queen by Has
Christian Anderson. In the advertising, Frozen was said to be based on the
story, but the film as we know is far from it. The Snow Queen, in an abridged
summary, is about a girl traveling up to a mountain to save her friend from the
clutches of an evil Snow Queen. Along the way, she meets various
characters – almost all of them are female. Looking at this story the way it
is, this would be a good opportunity to adapt this into a film, right?
Well,
Disney went another direction. Frozen tells of Elsa and Anna. When Elsa’s
powers are found out at her ball, she flees to isolation in the mountains. Anna
goes of to find her and get her back home. While I like Elsa and what little of
character we are shown of her, my main issue is with Anna.
Anna was
written as a likeable character, and through her naivety and quirks show an new
and interesting Princess character. She isn’t perfect, and she also isn’t
proper all of the times. It was refreshing. When she goes off to look for her
sister, she doesn’t go alone; she needs to the help of a man, her love
interest.
In the beginning of the film, she falls in love with someone within a couple of
hours. Though I think Disney was trying to get across the message “you can’t
marry a man you just met” (Why are they giving relationship advice to their
young audience?) Anna stills ends up with a man at the end. My question to
Disney; does your box office depend on the princess being with a prince at the
end? Is it going to somehow effect your merchandise sales if Anna and Kristoff
aren’t together?
I am not anti-romance, not at all,
but when you see the same constant trend of Disney movies – a man can have any
goal, but a woman’s goal only needs to be to get with a man – it’s taxing.
There are at least three songs in the film that talk about Anna and her quest for romantic love. It’s like her motivation from the beginning and until the end is to find true love, not to
get her sister down from the mountain.
Another thing that I noticed, and
it distracted me from the film itself, are the women’s character designs. Elsa,
Anna, and their dead mother all have the same face and body, just with different
colored attributes and hairstyles. Their eyes are very large, but their noses
and lips small. Their body shapes, too, look like sticks. If they were standing
next to male characters who looked as cartoonish as they did, it would have
gone unnoticed, but when you see the variety of male characters and the
stiffness in design of the female characters, you know they thought of making a
doll first before they thought of making a character.
Though I think Frozen has some good
messages about family and sisterly love, I don’t think there was any real progress
made. Films like Brave and The Princess and the Frog helped; Merida didn’t end
up with a prince, and saved her mother, and Tiana opened up her own restaurant and
saved herself and her man, and was also the first Black princess. I give Frozen
credit where credit is due, but I think it was also a missed opportunity for Disney.
I agree with your point here. Almost all Disney movies have an aspect of romance to them, even if it's not necessary. The story of Mulan has her fall for General Shan, but in reality, no mention of Shan is mentioned in the legends. In fact, Mulan was given different ranks for her twelve or so years fighting. Why couldn't Disney spin that tale? Is having a powerful woman in the military too taboo to portray to their audiences? But, instead of focusing on her heroic ability, her legend was cut to add room for love - incredibly unnecessary and a slap to the face for the real Hua Mulan.
ReplyDeleteLilo and Stitch is family based. In no way is the romance a part of the plot, but it's still there. Nani is in a relationship with David and struggles to keep the fire alive as her life with Lilo spirals out of control - but why? Why should Nani being in a relationship be needed? The biggest relationship should be between her and Lilo, and just her and Lilo.
I, personally, feel as if Disney furthers the social norm of romanticizing relationships. It's perfectly normal to not want a relationship or not have one, but with Disney movies, it's hard to oversee the "need" for a love. As progressive and feminist as Disney claims to be, I don't really think they are far better than any other industry, though they do mean well.
I completely agree with you. Frozen is by no mean s Disney's best film, yet it is being praised like one. Frozen is bland, from it's story to it's character designs. I hate that Anna, Elsa, and their mother all look the same. I love what you said, "you know they thought of making a doll first before they thought of making a character," because wow, I never really thought of that. As much as I do love Disney, they are a company, and they care about marketing and money. Since Anna and Elsa look like every other princess body-wise, it's probably easier to make their dolls, which doesn't leave room for unique princess body shapes.
ReplyDeleteNow for the romance. Romance sells, I guess. Two of the most neglected Disney movies I can think of are Emperor's New Groove and Treasure Planet. Romance is not part of the main plot in either of these movies (they're also not musicals), which might be why they are not as popular as say, Beauty and the Beast. Those movies, while not as popular, still feature men going on self-finding quests, something a female in a Disney movie has not done, or at least not done without finding love (like Mulan or Nani in Lilo and Stitch, like Kirsten said). The romance is so forced in this film, and it's ironic that Anna hasn't known Kristoff for that long by the end of the movie either and still falls in love with him. The movie could possibly have been stronger without a romantic plot.
I often wonder how Disney films would play out without romance. I often wonder about The Little Mermaid (which I may do a post on). Ariel was fascinated by the human world before Eric, and still would have wanted to go if he wasn't in the picture. She would have traded her voice (however, Ursula may no longer have wanted her voice and maybe would have wanted the Triton) for legs regardless, I think. But she did the trade after she met him, so no one really thinks that she made the trade because of her desire to be a human, only to be with him. So the moral becomes 'change yourself for a guy' instead of 'you can accomplish anything.' I wonder what Frozen would have been like without Anna's romance with Kristoff, as well as Hans.